Qiang Wang vs Tamara Zidansek Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
Q. Wang vs T. Zidansek

Qiang Wang
CHN
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
33
Age
27
1.72m
Height
1.68m
826
C. Rank
162
12
Best Rank
22
2
Total Titles
1
0
YTD Titles
0
$3.9M
Career Money
$2.0M
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
Right-Handed

Tamara Zidansek
SLO
w
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
33
Age
27
1.72m
Height
1.68m
826
C. Rank
162
12
Best Rank
22
2
Total Titles
1
0
YTD Titles
0
$3.9M
Career Money
$2.0M
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Wang 1 - 0 Zidansek
They have played 2 sets in total, with Qiang Wang winning 2 and Tamara Zidansek winning 0. The last match between Qiang Wang and Tamara Zidansek was at the Wimbledon - London, 04-07-2019, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Qiang Wang getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Wang | 1 |
| Zidansek | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Wimbledon - London(07-04-19)
Qiang Wang
6
6
Tamara Zidansek
1
2
Q. Wang vs T. Zidansek H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,853,637 | Career Prize Money | $2,033,811 |
| 58.71% (418-294) | Career Total W/L | 63.73% (383-218) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 17 | Titles | 22 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
Q. Wang vs T. Zidansek Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Qiang Wang has won 39.13% of points on their second serve, while Tamara Zidansek has won 38.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Qiang Wang, in recent form, has won 50.00% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tamara Zidansek has won 51.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.86% and 36.15% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Qiang Wang has saved 50.00% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tamara Zidansek has saved 46.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Qiang Wang has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/3), with Tamara Zidansek winning 59.65% (W/L 34/23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Qiang Wang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 314/196), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 35/36). Tamara Zidansek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 266/105), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 8/13).
- Player level: In the last year, Qiang Wang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/3), where as Tamara Zidansek has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.83% of matches (W/L 30/17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Qiang Wang winning 1 times and Tamara Zidansek being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Qiang Wang winning 2 and Tamara Zidansek winning 0.
- The last match between Qiang Wang and Tamara Zidansek was at the Wimbledon - London, 04-07-2019, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Qiang Wang getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:54:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Qiang Wang has played against opponents with an average rank of 524 while Tamara Zidansek has played against players with an average rank of 289.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Qiang Wang has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tamara Zidansek has won 41% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Qiang Wang has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tamara Zidansek has converted 43.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Qiang Wang vs Tamara Zidansek Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Q. Wang vs T. Zidansek H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 0:54:0 | Average Match Time | 0:54:0 |
| 46% (16/35) | 1st Serve % | 60% (33/55) |
| 100% (16/16) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (17/33) |
| 63% (12/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 27% (6/22) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (32/55) | Return Points Win % | 20% (7/35) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Wang 39%, Zidansek 45%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Wang 50%, Zidansek 57%.
Break Points Saved %: Wang 50%, Zidansek 53%.
Q. Wang Recent Matches Played
T. Zidansek Recent Matches Played

Q. Wang vs T. Zidansek Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.96% (418/291) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.73% (383/218) |
| 58.22% (942/676) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.96% (848/543) |
| 53.41% (7822/6824) | Games Win/Loss | 54.18% (6958/5884) |
| 61.57% (314/196) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.01% (88/78) |
| 49.30% (35/36) | Clay Win/Loss | 71.70% (266/105) |
| 54.55% (48/40) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.84% (21/22) |
| 52.50% (21/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 38.10% (8/13) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1077 | Aces Total | 521 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 997 | Total Double Faults | 1670 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:28:9 |
| 537.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 433.44 |
| 63% (18169/29059) | 1st Serve % | 66% (24624/37396) |
| 63% (11484/18169) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (14780/24624) |
| 47% (5157/10884) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5831/12776) |
| 47% (1755/3715) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2446/4996) |
| 45% (13285/29336) | Return Points Win % | 48% (17642/37115) |
| 50.75% (34/33) | Slam W/L | 48.44% (31/33) |
| 53.01% (44/39) | Masters W/L | 43.33% (13/17) |
| 73.08% (19/7) | Cups W/L | 47.37% (9/10) |
| 51.06% (96/92) | Main Tour W/L | 52.76% (67/60) |
| 64.29% (198/110) | Challenger W/L | 70.41% (207/87) |
| 72.97% (27/10) | Futures W/L | 83.58% (56/11) |
| 59% (412/695) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (379/589) |
| 50% (4/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 49% (61/125) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 64% (83/129) |
| 48% (95/198) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (112/195) |
| 86% (434/373) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (355/312) |
| 14% (434/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (355/40) |
| 16% (275/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (246/71) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
01:00 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
2.8
W2
1.37
03:30 AM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.069
W2
6.55
02:00 AM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
2.4
W2
1.49
08:30 AM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.65
W2
2.08
05:00 AM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.4
W2
2.68
02:00 AM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.86
W2
1.82
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
11 Nov 2025
Sebastian Baez vs Alvaro Guillen Meza Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 11, 2025
11 Nov 2025
Daniel Dutra Da Silva vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Viktor Durasovic vs Shintaro Mochizuki Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Taylor Fritz Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
H2H 5-5
22:30
H2H 5-4
H2H 7-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia